Zetwerk IPO Review: Is It a Good Opportunity Despite Its Losses?

Md Salman Ashrafi Image

Md Salman Ashrafi

Last updated:
6 min read
Zetwerk IPO Review: Can Growth Justify Its Valuation?
Table Of Contents
  • Zetwerk Is Building a Factory Network, Not Just Factories
  • The Opportunity Is Large, But Growth Alone Is Not Enough
  • Faster Growth Comes With Thinner Margins
  • Author's Take: Should You Apply For This IPO?

Zetwerk is entering the IPO market with a business that looks very different from a traditional manufacturer. Instead of relying only on its own factories, it connects thousands of smaller factories across countries and coordinates the entire process for large customers.

That model has helped revenue grow 40.43% to ₹15,913 crore in FY26. The company is also moving into areas such as power transformers, defence and solar manufacturing, where demand is rising. But there is a catch: Zetwerk still reported a ₹964 crore net loss in FY26 and generated negative operating cash flow.

So the central question is not whether Zetwerk can grow. Its recent numbers show that it can. The bigger question is whether it can convert that growth into consistent profits and cash generation.

Zetwerk Is Building a Factory Network, Not Just Factories

Think of Zetwerk as a coordinator for large industrial orders.

A company may need a customised product such as a solar component, electric vehicle charger or power transformer. Instead of finding and managing several factories itself, it can give the order to Zetwerk. Zetwerk uses its software, Zetwerk OS, to coordinate suppliers, production, quality checks, and delivery.

The company combines 6,979 partner factories across 26 countries with 26 of its own facilities. Partner factories generated 66.83% of manufacturing revenue in FY26. This gives Zetwerk a way to add production capacity without investing in every factory itself.

It earns revenue from two main activities. Custom manufacturing contributed 58.91% of FY26 operating revenue, while its Terra91 business, which buys and sells metals such as steel, aluminium and copper, contributed 41.09%.

The manufacturing business is the more important part of the investment story because it gives Zetwerk the opportunity to build deeper relationships with customers. Repeat customers contributed 80.15% of manufacturing revenue in FY26, while its median net revenue retention was 128.85% between FY23 and FY26. In simple words, existing customers have tended to spend more with Zetwerk over time.

The company is also moving towards original design manufacturing, where it helps customers design products rather than only manufacture designs supplied by them.

Zetwerk is coming to investors as a mainboard IPO, rather than as a small-company listing. But its operating model matters more than the label: the company is trying to become the layer that connects industrial demand with fragmented manufacturing capacity.

The Opportunity Is Large, But Growth Alone Is Not Enough

The opportunity exists because industrial manufacturing is becoming more complex. Companies are diversifying supply chains, while investments in renewable energy, AI data centres and defence are creating demand for specialised equipment.

The Indian manufacturing-platform market is projected to grow from roughly ₹10.3-₹12.6 trillion in FY26 to ₹17.7-₹20.0 trillion by FY31. The US opportunity is also expected to expand sharply.

Zetwerk has already shown that its model can solve a real problem. Power transformer deliveries to the US were reduced to 12-15 months in FY26, compared with typical timelines of 36-42 months in the US. The company secured ₹2,032 crore of transformer orders during the year.

Its ability to split orders across multiple suppliers is part of the advantage. An order was distributed across an average of seven suppliers in FY26, compared with three in FY24, while the company maintained a 99% first-pass completion rate.

But a large market does not automatically create shareholder value. Zetwerk's biggest challenge is converting its growing revenue into stronger economics.

Its Adjusted EBITDA reached ₹421 crore in FY26, but the margin was only 2.65%. The business also carried ₹1,911 crore of borrowings and incurred ₹366 crore of finance costs. Its negative operating cash flow is another concern because manufacturing and procurement require cash before customers pay.

The IPO directly addresses part of this problem. Zetwerk plans to use ₹2,160 crore of the ₹2,830 crore fresh issue to repay debt. Lower borrowing should reduce interest costs, but it does not guarantee profitability. The business still needs to improve margins and cash conversion.

Faster Growth Comes With Thinner Margins

The peer comparison highlights the trade-off investors are being asked to accept.

Zetwerk's FY26 revenue growth of 40.43% was substantially faster than the roughly 13% CAGR benchmark for its listed manufacturing peers. Its manufacturing ROCE was also 22.75%, suggesting that the asset-light model can generate reasonable returns on the capital employed in manufacturing.

However, its margins are much thinner. Zetwerk's overall Adjusted EBITDA margin was 2.65%, while the peer benchmarks were around 16% for energy companies, 18% for capital goods, and 11% for precision components.

Part of the reason is Terra91. The metal trading business generated 41.09% of revenue but had an EBITDA margin of only 1.24%. This means a large amount of revenue produces relatively little operating profit.

That makes the valuation more difficult to judge using P/E. Zetwerk reported a net loss in FY26, so its negative P/E does not provide a useful comparison.

At the upper IPO price of ₹151, the implied market capitalisation is ₹26,050 crore. Against FY26 revenue of ₹15,913 crore, the valuation is approximately 1.64 times sales.

That multiple is not obviously excessive for a company growing revenue at more than 40%, particularly when its model can scale through third-party suppliers. But it is also not automatically cheap. Investors are paying for continued growth while accepting much lower margins and weaker cash generation than established manufacturing companies.

The crucial variable is therefore profitability. If debt repayment lowers finance costs and Zetwerk can maintain growth while improving margins, the current sales multiple can become easier to justify. If revenue grows without meaningful improvement in profits and cash flow, the valuation becomes harder to defend.

Author's Take: Should You Apply For This IPO?

Zetwerk offers an interesting combination of high growth, an asset-light manufacturing network and exposure to areas such as renewable energy, transformers and defence. Its 40.43% FY26 revenue growth, 80.15% repeat-customer contribution and 22.75% manufacturing ROCE suggest that the platform is solving a genuine customer problem and gaining scale.

The concern is what happens after that growth. The company still reported a ₹964 crore net loss, carried ₹1,911 crore of debt, and operated with very thin margins. Its metal-trading business also adds substantial revenue without adding much profitability.

The planned ₹2,160 crore debt repayment is therefore important. It could reduce finance costs and allow more operating profit to reach the bottom line. But investors should not treat that as proof that profitability will automatically follow.

At around 1.64x FY26 sales, Zetwerk's valuation appears reasonable given its strong revenue growth. However, the company still needs to prove that it can turn this growth into consistent profits and positive cash flow. We view the IPO as a balanced but positive opportunity, supported by its growth potential but tempered by the uncertainty around sustainable profitability.

Investors looking to compare it with other opportunities can also read how to analyse an IPO before applying. Read the RA disclaimer here.

Share: