Why HUL Shares Fell 6% Despite Best Growth in 13 Quarters: What Investors Need to Know?

Rahul Asati Image

Rahul Asati

Last updated:
6 min read
image with title "Why HUL Shares Fell Despite Best Growth in 13 Quarters"
Table Of Contents
  • HUL Q1 FY27 Results: Key Numbers
  • Why Did HUL Shares Fall Around 6%?
  • Home Care Delivered Growth Without Meaningful Profit Growth
  • Beauty Is Becoming an Important Profit Engine
  • Personal Care Growth Was Driven by Pricing
  • Foods Delivered Better Profit Conversion
  • Why the Reported Profit Decline Is Not the Main Concern
  • What Has HUL Guided for FY27?
  • Author’s Take

Hindustan Unilever, or HUL, shares fell around 6% after the company announced its Q1 FY27 results.

At first glance, the sharp fall may appear surprising. HUL delivered 10% underlying sales growth, its highest in 13 quarters. Turnover reached ₹17,184 crore, while EBITDA increased 8% year-on-year to ₹3,947 crore.

However, investors looked beyond the headline revenue growth. Volume growth was weaker than expected, margins declined and the company’s fastest-growing segment generated almost no additional profit.

The stock’s fall therefore appears to be an expectation reset rather than a sign of a major deterioration in HUL’s business.

HUL Q1 FY27 Results: Key Numbers

MetricQ1 FY27YoY change
Turnover (Sales)₹17,184 crore+10%
Underlying sales growth10%Highest in 13 quarters
Underlying volume growth5%Up from 4% last year
EBITDA₹3,947 crore+8%
EBITDA margin23.0%-40 basis points
PAT before exceptional items₹2,731 crore+9%
Reported PAT₹2,680 crore-2%

HUL’s reported profit declined because the corresponding quarter last year included a one-off tax credit. Excluding exceptional items, profit increased 9%.

This means the reported profit decline was not the only reason behind the fall in HUL’s share price. The larger concerns were weaker-than-expected volume growth and pressure on profitability.

Why Did HUL Shares Fall Around 6%?

1. Volume Growth Missed Investor Expectations

HUL’s underlying sales growth reached 10%, with an equal contribution from price and volume.

Underlying volume growth, or UVG, was 5%. In simple terms, UVG indicates whether consumers are buying more products or shifting towards a more valuable product mix.

A 5% volume increase is not weak by itself. However, the market was expecting stronger volume growth. It was also lower than the 6% volume growth HUL delivered in the March quarter.

This created an unusual situation. HUL’s underlying sales growth accelerated from 7% in the March quarter to 10% in the June quarter. But its volume growth slowed from 6% to 5%.

The difference came from price increases. Around half of HUL’s underlying sales growth during the quarter was supported by pricing.

For investors, volume-led growth is usually more encouraging than price-led growth because a company cannot keep increasing prices indefinitely without affecting demand.

2. Sales Grew Faster Than Profits

HUL’s turnover increased 10%, but EBITDA grew only 8%. Consequently, the EBITDA margin declined by 40 basis points year-on-year to 23%.

The sequential comparison was also weak. HUL had reported an EBITDA margin of 23.7% in the March quarter, which means the margin declined by around 70 basis points in one quarter.

This shows that HUL is generating stronger revenue growth, but every additional rupee of sales is not producing a similar increase in operating profit.

Higher commodity costs were one reason. HUL said commodity volatility continued and inflationary pressures could remain in the short term.

The company is also investing in advertising, market development, new products and distribution. These investments may support long-term growth, but they limit immediate margin expansion.

Home Care Delivered Growth Without Meaningful Profit Growth

The Home Care segment provides the clearest explanation of HUL’s margin pressure.

Home Care revenue increased from ₹5,777 crore to ₹6,554 crore, a growth of around 13%. The segment reported underlying sales growth of 14%, its highest growth in three years.

Fabric Wash delivered double-digit growth, while household cleaning products also recorded double-digit sales and volume growth.

However, Home Care segment profit increased only from ₹1,129 crore to ₹1,137 crore. HUL generated approximately ₹777 crore of additional Home Care revenue but only ₹8 crore of additional segment profit.

As a result, the segment margin declined from around 19.5% to 17.3%.

This suggests HUL may be absorbing commodity inflation and increasing investments to gain volumes and strengthen market share. The strategy is helping sales, but the profit benefit has not yet followed.

Beauty Is Becoming an Important Profit Engine

HUL’s Beauty & Wellbeing business delivered a much better combination of growth and profitability.

The segment’s revenue increased 12% to ₹4,083 crore, while segment profit increased nearly 13% to ₹1,126 crore. Its operating margin remained close to 28%, the highest among HUL’s major businesses.

Interestingly, Beauty & Wellbeing generated almost the same segment profit as Home Care despite having around 38% lower revenue.

Premium Hair Care delivered double-digit, volume-led growth. Premium Skin Care also recorded double-digit growth, while Minimalist maintained its double-digit growth trajectory.

This explains why premium beauty has become an important part of HUL’s growth strategy. These products can deliver faster growth and better margins than several mass-market household categories.

Personal Care Growth Was Driven by Pricing

HUL’s Personal Care business reported 4% underlying sales growth, but underlying volumes declined in the low-single digits.

The company said Skin Cleansing growth was driven by price increases as palm oil inflation continued for the second consecutive year.

This indicates that revenue increased despite consumers buying fewer products or shifting towards smaller packs and less expensive options.

However, the performance within Personal Care was not uniform.

Premium brands such as Dove and Pears delivered double-digit, volume-led growth. Bodywash also maintained double-digit growth, while premium oral-care products continued to gain traction.

This shows that price-sensitive mass-market products are facing pressure, while premium categories continue to attract consumer demand.

Foods Delivered Better Profit Conversion

HUL’s Foods segment delivered a more balanced quarter. Segment revenue increased around 7% to ₹3,480 crore, while segment profit increased approximately 14% to ₹692 crore. Its margin improved from around 18.7% to nearly 20%.

Coffee delivered double-digit, volume-led growth, while ready-to-drink products and Bru Gold continued to scale. Lifestyle Nutrition also recorded double-digit growth, with Boost crossing ₹1,000 crore in annual turnover.

Packaged Foods delivered high-single-digit growth, supported by mayonnaise, sauces and Unilever Food Solutions.

Unlike Home Care, the Foods business converted revenue growth into faster profit growth, indicating a favourable product mix and better operating efficiency.

Why the Reported Profit Decline Is Not the Main Concern

HUL’s reported PAT declined 2% to ₹2,680 crore. However, the previous year’s profit benefited from a one-off tax credit. HUL’s tax expense increased from ₹485 crore to ₹939 crore due largely to this base effect.

Before exceptional items, PAT increased 9% to ₹2,731 crore.

Therefore, the fall in reported profit does not indicate that HUL’s core operating profit declined. Investors are likely to have adjusted for this one-off item.

The more important concerns were that volume growth missed expectations, margins contracted and the Home Care segment’s strong sales growth did not translate into meaningful profit growth.

What Has HUL Guided for FY27?

HUL expects FY27 to be better than FY26, supported by portfolio transformation and channel expansion.

However, management has also warned that commodity volatility and inflationary pressures could continue in the short term. The company expects its consolidated EBITDA margin to remain around the current guided range.

This means investors may not see a sharp margin recovery immediately.

Near-term earnings growth will depend on whether HUL can maintain strong volumes, expand premium categories, improve its product mix and gain market share without relying excessively on discounts or price increases.

Author’s Take

HUL’s Q1 FY27 performance was not fundamentally weak. The company delivered its highest underlying sales growth in 13 quarters, gained competitiveness and recorded broad-based growth across Home Care, Beauty and Foods.

But markets react to expectations, not just year-on-year growth.

After HUL delivered 6% volume growth in the March quarter, investors expected the recovery to strengthen further. Instead, volume growth slowed to 5%. At the same time, higher sales did not fully translate into profit growth.

The biggest question for investors is therefore not whether HUL can grow revenue. The quarter has shown that it can.

The key question is whether HUL can maintain volume growth while restoring margins, particularly in Home Care. Until that profit conversion becomes visible, strong headline sales growth alone may not be enough to support a sustained re-rating in the stock.

Share: