Why Is Apollo Micro Systems Share Rising? Q2 FY27 Results Explained

Anubhav Fatehpuria Image

Anubhav Fatehpuria

Last updated:
7 min read
image with title "Apollo Micro Systems Surges 12%! Why?"
Table Of Contents
  • Apollo Micro Systems Q2 FY27 Results: Revenue, Profit and Margins
  • Apollo Micro Systems Share Price Rises After Q2 Results
  • Revenue Growth Reflects Both the Existing Business and Acquisitions
  • Operating Profit Improves, While Higher Taxes Limit Net Profit
  • ₹1,765 Crore Order Book Provides Revenue Visibility
  • Cash Flow and Subsidiary Finances Remain Key Risks
  • Apollo Micro Systems Growth Outlook and Investor Expectations

Apollo Micro Systems reported a 72.3% year-on-year jump in consolidated revenue to ₹388.15 crore for the July–September 2026 quarter. Net profit grew 53.7% to ₹46.15 crore, while operating profit rose 87.8%. Its order book also reached a record ₹1,765 crore. The results are strong, but the full story is about how much of this growth comes from the existing business, how much comes from acquisitions, and how efficiently the company turns its sales into cash.

Apollo Micro Systems Q2 FY27 Results: Revenue, Profit and Margins

Here is the year-on-year comparison, using consolidated figures that include its subsidiaries.

Financial metricQ2 FY26Q2 FY27Change
Revenue from operations₹225.26 crore₹388.15 crore+72.3%
Operating profit (EBITDA)*₹59.19 crore₹111.18 crore+87.8%
Operating profit margin26.3%28.6%+2.3 percentage points
Profit before tax₹43.15 crore₹92.48 crore+114.3%
Net profit₹30.03 crore₹46.15 crore+53.7%

Operating profit here excludes other income. Figures are rounded from the company's unaudited results for the quarter ended September 30, 2026.

Revenue also rose 54.5% over the preceding April-June quarter, while net profit increased 83%. So the September quarter was not just stronger than a year ago; it was substantially stronger than the immediately preceding quarter.

The main positive is that operating profit grew faster than sales. In simple terms, the company earned more from each ₹100 of business than it did a year earlier. But the much slower growth in net profit shows why the headline revenue number alone is not enough to judge the results.

Apollo Micro Systems Share Price Rises After Q2 Results

Apollo Micro Systems shares reacted positively when trading resumed on October 26. The stock rose around 12% to approximately ₹419.90 during intraday trading, according to market reporting around noon. This was an intraday price, not the day's closing price.

The market had two clear reasons to pay attention: faster operating profit growth and a record order book. Still, a strong quarter does not, by itself, establish that any share-price increase is justified. The more useful test is whether the company can maintain that performance as it expands.

Revenue Growth Reflects Both the Existing Business and Acquisitions

There is an important distinction behind the 72.3% sales growth. On a standalone basis, which largely reflects Apollo Micro Systems' own operations without its subsidiaries, revenue rose 36% year-on-year to ₹306.29 crore. Consolidated revenue, which includes subsidiaries, grew 72.3% to ₹388.15 crore.

Part of the reason the two growth rates differ is the acquisition of IDL Explosives. Apollo's subsidiary completed the ₹107 crore purchase in November 2025. IDL therefore contributes to this year's consolidated results but was not part of the group in the September 2025 quarter.

The acquisition has expanded Apollo's consolidated revenue base, but its contribution to profitability remains a work in progress. IDL Explosives reported a loss during the first half of FY27, and management acknowledged on the October 26 earnings call that improving its margins would require further operational changes. This reinforces the distinction between acquiring additional sales and generating stronger earnings from those acquisitions.

The difference becomes clearer when the absolute numbers are compared. Consolidated revenue increased by ₹162.89 crore year-on-year, while standalone revenue rose by approximately ₹81.03 crore. This means roughly half the incremental consolidated revenue came from subsidiaries and consolidation effects. Yet consolidated EBITDA of ₹111.18 crore was only ₹3.62 crore higher than standalone EBITDA of ₹107.56 crore. The comparison shows that the additional revenue outside the standalone business contributed relatively little incremental operating profit during the quarter.

That does not take away from the improvement in Apollo's existing operations. Its standalone revenue rose 36% year-on-year, and standalone operating profit grew 81.6%. But it would be misleading to describe the entire 72% consolidated increase as organic growth. Also, the approximately 97% rise in standalone revenue highlighted elsewhere in the company's materials is quarter-on-quarter, not year-on-year.

Operating Profit Improves, While Higher Taxes Limit Net Profit

The company's consolidated operating profit margin rose from 26.3% to 28.6%. Put simply, for every ₹100 in revenue, Apollo generated about ₹28.60 in operating profit, compared with ₹26.30 a year earlier.

That is an encouraging sign: costs before interest, depreciation and tax did not rise as quickly as revenue. The company's standalone operating margin was even higher at 35.1%, against 26.3% a year earlier. However, that standalone margin should not be treated as the margin for the entire group.

So why did consolidated profit before tax more than double while net profit rose only 53.7%? The reported tax expense increased from ₹13.12 crore to ₹46.32 crore. That includes a larger deferred-tax charge, which is an accounting tax expense rather than an immediate cash tax payment.

The higher tax bill explains much of the gap between growth in profit before tax and growth in net profit. It is too early to assume this quarter's unusually high tax expense will be repeated, or that it will automatically disappear. The company's future results will provide a clearer picture.

Another distinction for shareholders is earnings per share. Although consolidated net profit increased 53.7%, basic EPS rose only 37.5%, from ₹0.96 to ₹1.32. The company also reported ₹48.43 crore in profit attributable to owners of the parent, compared with total consolidated net profit of ₹46.15 crore, reflecting losses attributable to non-controlling interests. These figures show why investors should examine per-share earnings and profit ownership alongside the headline consolidated profit number.

₹1,765 Crore Order Book Provides Revenue Visibility

Apollo Micro Systems reported an order book of ₹1,765 crore as of September 30, 2026, its highest so far. That is approximately 1.95 times its consolidated revenue of ₹904.32 crore in FY26.

An order book represents work the company has secured but has not yet fully delivered or recognised as sales. It offers visibility into future business; it is not the same as cash received or profit already earned. The pace of delivery and the costs involved will decide how much of this order book reaches future financial results.

The longer-term business shift is also worth following. Apollo has traditionally supplied important electronics and systems used in defence equipment. It is now developing broader capabilities in weapons and ammunition, including naval mines, rockets and explosives. Its investor presentation discusses the Multi-Influence Ground Mine programme moving towards production and outlines plans to build more parts of weapon systems in-house.

This could allow Apollo to handle a larger share of certain defence projects rather than supplying only components. But development milestones and approvals should not be confused with confirmed orders of a disclosed value. The company's ability to convert these programmes into commercially delivered products remains the central business test.

Cash Flow and Subsidiary Finances Remain Key Risks

Apollo reported ₹71.37 crore in consolidated net profit for the first half of FY27, but cash generated from its day-to-day operations was ₹22.44 crore. 

That means operating cash flow was equivalent to only about 31% of reported net profit during the half-year. Although cash generation remained positive, the substantial gap between accounting earnings and operating cash flow highlights the need for stronger cash conversion as the business expands.

This is particularly relevant for defence manufacturers, where inventory, project work and customer payments can tie up money for long periods. Apollo reported 353 working-capital days for H1 FY27, down only slightly from 359 days in FY26. Cash flow was positive, which is encouraging, but it still needs to become stronger relative to earnings.

The auditor's limited-review report also highlighted material uncertainty over the ability of certain subsidiaries to continue as going concerns, citing negative net worth, cash losses and substantial borrowings or liabilities. Management has prepared their financial statements on a going-concern basis, citing support from the parent company and promoters. The auditor did not modify its overall conclusion. While this does not establish a going-concern problem for Apollo Micro Systems as a whole, the financial condition of these subsidiaries adds risk to the group's expansion plans.

Apollo Micro Systems Growth Outlook and Investor Expectations

Apollo's Q2 results show clear progress: revenue is rising, its existing operations are more profitable, and its order book offers substantial future work. These are genuine strengths.

The less certain part is how the next stage of expansion will translate into profit and cash. Acquired businesses need to contribute more than sales, new defence programmes need to become deliveries, and the company must collect payments without letting its financing needs grow too quickly.

For investors following Indian defence stocks, the next few quarters will be more informative than the headline growth rate alone. The numbers to watch are standalone revenue growth, profit margins, order deliveries, tax expenses and cash generated from operations.

Apollo Micro Systems has delivered a strong quarter, and its move towards broader weapons manufacturing makes the growth story more substantial than a one-off earnings jump. But the company still has to prove that record orders and rapid expansion can produce steady profits and stronger cash flow. That distinction matters just as much as the share-price reaction.

Share: