IFL Finance IPO Gets SEBI Nod: 57% Loan Growth, but What Are the Risks?

IFL Finance has received SEBI's approval to proceed with its IPO, bringing another gold-loan-focused lender closer to the Indian stock market. The company has expanded its loan portfolio, increased its customer base and reported higher profits.

However, there is an important concern. While IFL Finance's loan portfolio grew nearly 57% in FY26, its borrowings increased by approximately 107%. Its lending margins also declined, raising questions about the sustainability of this growth.

For retail investors, the bigger question is whether IFL Finance can continue expanding its business without putting pressure on profitability and financial stability.

What Are the Key Details of the IFL Finance IPO?

IFL Finance received SEBI's observations on November 5, 2026, after filing its draft IPO documents in July. This allows the company to move towards launching its public issue, subject to applicable requirements.

Sources: SEBI Draft Abridged Prospectus, July 2026

The IPO consists of two parts. The fresh issue will raise money for the company, while the offer for sale will allow existing shareholders to sell part of their holdings. 

IFL Finance proposes to use ₹150 crore from the fresh issue proceeds to strengthen its capital base and support future lending growth. The final issue structure may change depending on any pre-IPO placement. Since the price band has not been announced, investors cannot yet determine whether the IPO is attractively valued.

What Does IFL Finance Do, and Why Is Its Gold Loan Business Growing?

IFL Finance is a non-deposit-taking NBFC primarily focused on secured lending. Its main business is providing loans against gold jewellery, although it also services existing home loans and loans against property.

The business model is straightforward. Customers pledge gold jewellery to borrow money, and IFL Finance earns interest on those loans. Gold collateral provides some protection against defaults, although the lender still faces risks from falling gold prices, inadequate collateral valuation and difficulties in recovering loans.

The company has increasingly focused on gold lending. Gold loans accounted for 84.77% of its gross loan portfolio in FY26, compared with 41.45% in FY24.

Its business expansion is visible in several important numbers:

• Gross loan assets under management increased from ₹332.11 crore in FY25 to ₹520.49 crore in FY26.
• Active customers increased from 28,287 to 33,951.
• The branch network expanded from 77 to 88 locations.
• Loan disbursements increased 179.01% year-on-year to ₹1,336.41 crore in FY26.

Source: IFL Finance Draft Abridged Prospectus, FY26 financial and operational disclosures.

These figures indicate strong growth in lending activity. However, the increasing dependence on gold loans also makes the company's performance more sensitive to changes in gold prices, lending regulations and borrower repayment behaviour.

How Strong Are IFL Finance's Financials?

IFL Finance has reported improving revenue and profitability, but its rising borrowings and declining lending margins require closer examination.

Source: IFL Finance Draft Abridged Prospectus.

The positive development is that revenue and net profit both grew approximately 19% in FY26, while the company's loan portfolio expanded significantly faster. However, borrowings more than doubled during the same period. For an NBFC, borrowing money to provide loans is part of its business model, so rising debt is not automatically negative. The real concern is whether the company earns enough from lending to cover borrowing costs while maintaining healthy margins.

This is where IFL Finance's declining net interest margin becomes important. Its NIM fell from 14.09% in FY25 to 11.18% in FY26, suggesting that the profitability of its lending operations faced pressure despite rapid business expansion. For investors, the company's future performance will depend not only on how much its loan portfolio grows, but also on how efficiently it funds that growth.

What Are the Biggest Risks in the IFL Finance IPO?

The company's draft prospectus highlights several financial and operational risks that retail investors should understand.

• Rising borrowings: Total borrowings increased from ₹187.80 crore in FY25 to ₹388.22 crore in FY26. Its borrowings-to-equity ratio also increased from 1.18x to 2.14x, making funding costs and financial stability important considerations.
• Declining lending margins: The average loan yield declined from 22.57% to 19.08%, while the average cost of borrowing decreased from 13.91% to 11.53%. Since lending yields fell more sharply, the company experienced pressure on its interest margins.
• Asset quality: Gross NPA increased from 0.67% to 0.79%, while the provision coverage ratio declined from 31.84% to 27.62%. Although the reported NPA ratio remains relatively low, continued deterioration could affect profitability.
• Gold loan concentration: Nearly 85% of the company's gross loan portfolio comes from gold lending. This concentration exposes its business to changes in gold prices, collateral valuations, recovery processes and regulatory requirements.
• Cash flow: IFL Finance reported negative operating cash flow of approximately ₹152.61 crore in FY26. However, negative operating cash flow is not necessarily unusual for a growing NBFC because new loan disbursements consume cash. Investors should evaluate this figure alongside loan growth, financing arrangements and liquidity.

Source: IFL Finance Draft Abridged Prospectus, FY26 financial KPIs and risk disclosures.

The biggest concern is the combination of rising leverage and declining margins. If borrowing costs increase or lending yields decline further, profit growth could become more difficult even if the loan portfolio continues expanding.

Is IFL Finance IPO Valuation Attractive?

This remains the most important unanswered question for retail investors.

IFL Finance has not announced its IPO price band. Therefore, its final market capitalisation, price-to-earnings ratio and price-to-book ratio cannot yet be calculated. For NBFCs, the price-to-book ratio is particularly relevant because lending businesses are often valued based on their net assets, return on equity and asset quality. IFL Finance reported a net asset value of ₹21.40 per share and return on equity of 12.68% for FY26.

Once the price band is announced, investors should compare these figures with those of listed secured-lending and gold-loan NBFCs. However, differences in company size, funding costs, profitability and asset quality must also be considered. A company growing its loan portfolio rapidly does not automatically deserve a premium valuation, particularly when its margins are declining and leverage is increasing.

What Should Retail Investors Track Before the IPO Opens?

Before evaluating the IPO, investors should examine the company's updated financial disclosures and final issue details.

The first factor is whether IFL Finance can sustain its loan growth while controlling borrowings. A growing loan portfolio is encouraging, but higher lending activity must eventually translate into sustainable earnings.

The second factor is net interest margin. If the company's lending margins stabilise or improve, it could indicate better pricing power or more efficient funding. Continued margin compression would make profitability more challenging.

Asset quality is equally important. Retail investors should monitor gross and net NPAs, provision coverage and the company's ability to recover loans without substantial losses. Finally, the IPO valuation will determine how much investors are being asked to pay for this growth. The final price band, price-to-book multiple and peer comparison will be essential before making any investment decision.

Author's Take

IFL Finance's strong loan portfolio growth, expanding customer base and improving profitability make it an interesting company to follow ahead of its IPO. The proposed capital infusion could also provide additional support for future lending. However, the company's financial performance reveals an important trade-off. Borrowings increased substantially faster than the loan portfolio, while net interest margins declined. Its growing dependence on gold-backed lending also introduces concentration risk.

For retail investors, the real question is whether IFL Finance can maintain strong lending growth while improving funding efficiency, protecting margins and controlling credit risk. The next step should be to examine the final price band and updated financial results, particularly return on equity, price-to-book valuation, borrowing costs and asset-quality trends. 

IFL Finance has demonstrated growth, but whether that growth makes it an attractive IPO will depend heavily on the valuation investors are asked to pay.

For more open and upcoming IPOs, visit INDmoney’s IPO tracker.