
Omnitech Engineering IPO Price Range is ₹216 - ₹227, with a minimum investment of ₹14,982 for 66 shares per lot.
Subscription Rate
1.14x
as on 27 Feb 2026, 05:15PM IST
Minimum Investment
₹14,982
/ 66 shares
IPO Status
Price Band
₹216 - ₹227
Bidding Dates
Feb 25, 2026 - Feb 27, 2026
Issue Size
₹583.00 Cr
Lot Size
66 shares
Min Investment
₹14,982
Listing Exchange
BSE
IPO Doc

as on 27 Feb 2026, 05:15PM IST
IPO subscribed over
🚀 1.14x
This IPO has been subscribed by 0.326x in the retail category and 2.857x in the QIB category.
| Total Subscription | 1.14x |
| Retail Individual Investors | 0.326x |
| Qualified Institutional Buyers | 2.857x |
| Non Institutional Investors | 0.731x |
Omnitech Engineering is raising about ₹583 crore through the IPO. This short video explains what the company does, how it earns from making precision parts for global industries, its growth plans, and the key things investors should know before investing in the IPO.
Total income climbed from ₹183.71 crore in FY23 to ₹349.71 crore in FY25. It dipped slightly to ₹181.95 crore in FY24. Even though the company's actual product sales grew a little bit that year, it was not enough to make up for a drop in foreign exchange gains, which ultimately pulled the overall total down. But then FY25 jumped sharply, helped by higher manufacturing capacity and a big wave of new customer orders coming in.
Profit tells a slightly bumpier story. It fell from ₹32.3 crore in FY23 to ₹18.9 crore in FY24 because interest costs went up on new loans and depreciation (the accounting cost of new machines over time) also rose after adding fresh machinery. In FY25, profit bounced back to ₹43.9 crore, mostly because the rise in sales was strong enough to cover those higher costs.
To make this growth possible, the company expanded its total assets aggressively from ₹185.2 crore to ₹626.3 crore. A lot of that expansion was funded through debt, which is why borrowings jumped from ₹88.8 crore to ₹330.6 crore. These loans were largely used to set up new manufacturing facilities and to fund higher working capital (money tied up in inventory and day-to-day running), like holding more stock.
Even with all this expansion, operating profitability stayed quite solid. The EBITDA margin stayed in the 34%-36% range, though it edged down to 34.31% in FY25. Net profit margin followed the profit ups and downs, falling to 10.39% in FY24, then improving to 12.54% in FY25, still weighed down by heavy interest and depreciation.
The big pressure point is cash. In FY25, operating cash flow (cash generated from daily operations) turned negative and the business consumed ₹68.98 crore. The RHP pins this cash burn mainly on working capital needs - buying more inventory and waiting longer to collect money from customers as the business scaled up.
The company had a really strong year, with revenue up 92.45% to ₹342.91 crore. What’s nice is it didn’t grow by burning profits; its operating profit margin (profit from core business before interest and taxes) stayed high at 34.31%, which shows it can scale up and still stay profitable.
Its unexecuted order book (work already booked but not yet delivered) rose to ₹1,764.78 crore, as of September 30, 2025, which is more than 5 times its FY25 revenue. This gives pretty clear visibility into future revenue and is a good sign that customers are actively buying its precision-engineered products.
It’s not just an India story, 74.95% of last year’s revenue came from outside India. The company supplies 256 customers across 24 countries, and the US warehouse helps it serve overseas clients more smoothly, especially in the American market.
Customer stickiness looks solid. In the last financial year, 101 repeat customers contributed 79.78% of total revenue. Plus, the average customer relationship is about 3.80 years, which usually means repeat orders and a more predictable flow of business.
It runs three facilities spread across 80,802.68 square meters, with an installed capacity of 24 lakh (2,429,856) machine hours. That scale matters because it helps them handle a wide range of custom jobs - anything from a tiny 0.003 kg part to a heavy 503.33 kg component - without getting overwhelmed operationally.
Interestingly, it’s not only about metal and machines. It has a subsidiary with 15 employees building specialised software to automate manufacturing operations, and it even wants to license that software to other companies, so potentially a second revenue stream over time. They’re also using industrial robots across machining lines instead of relying purely on manual work. The practical benefit is speed plus consistency, complex parts get produced the same way every time, with fewer human errors.
The company depends a lot on a small set of buyers; its top 10 customers made up 47.87% of revenue last year. And here’s the bigger single-point risk: one customer alone accounts for 58.5% (₹1,038.87 crore) of the current order book. If that customer slows down, delays, or renegotiates, it can quickly show up in sales and cash flow.
As of September 30, 2025, total debt was ₹382.91 crore, and the debt-to-equity ratio is 1.66 times (meaning roughly ₹1.66 of debt for every ₹1 of shareholder equity). With that kind of leverage (heavy use of borrowing), a bigger chunk of cash has to go into interest and repayments, which reduces financial flexibility, especially in weaker cycles.
The company needs a lot of money tied up in working capital (cash stuck in inventory and unpaid customer bills, net of what you owe suppliers), and its working capital requirement jumped to ₹265.58 crore in FY25 from ₹96 crore a year ago. Its working capital cycle is also very long at 283 days, which means it can take that long to turn cash spent on materials and production back into cash collected from customers. A long cycle like this can make growth feel “cash-hungry”, even when profits look good on paper.
North America contributed 59.24% of revenue last year, so the company is meaningfully exposed to that region. If the US sees higher import tariffs, tougher trade rules, or even a demand slowdown, it can hurt pricing power and reduce order inflows. In simple words, too much dependence on one geography can turn external policy or economic changes into a direct hit on sales.
In the previous financial year, the business used up ₹68.98 crore of cash from operations (cash generated or consumed by the core day-to-day business). Negative operating cash flow basically means the company is spending more cash running the business than it’s bringing in from customers during that period. If this stays negative for long, the company may need extra funding (more debt or fresh capital) just to comfortably run daily operations.
All existing and upcoming plants are in one city, Rajkot, which creates a location risk. If something local goes wrong (like the severe flooding mentioned for the last financial year), it can disrupt the whole manufacturing setup at once. That kind of “all eggs in one basket” operational risk is worth tracking, especially for a company with a large order backlog and tight delivery schedules.
Company | Operating Revenue | EBITDA Margin | Profit | P/E Ratio | Return on Equity |
Omnitech Engineering | ₹342.91 Cr | 34.31% | ₹43.87 Cr | 50.53x | 21.55% |
₹457.35 Cr | 35.27% | ₹86.53 Cr | 103.30x | 6.26% | |
₹242.93 Cr | 37.90% | ₹83.46 Cr | 56.68x | 12.48% | |
₹308.07 Cr | 24.43% | ₹61.02 Cr | 428.48x | 4.40% | |
₹676 Cr | 17.87% | ₹52.89 Cr | 196.78x | 7.26% | |
₹1,403.80 Cr | 11.28% | ₹43.04 Cr | 139.28x | 6.00% |
| Promoters & Promoter Group | 94.08% | |
| Name | Role | Stakeholding |
| Udaykumar Arunkumar Parekh | Promoter | 93.04% |
| Parekh Riddhi Paras | Promoter Group | 0.95% |
| Indumati Arunbhai Parekh | Promoter Group | 0.1% |
| Others | 5.91% |
Omnitech Engineering IPO Explained: Order Book, Exports, Risks, and Valuation – What Matters
Omnitech Engineering IPO explained: what the company does, where the money goes, strengths, risks, peer comparison, and valuation at ~50x P/E.

Omnitech Engineering is promoted by two people: Udaykumar Arunkumar Parekh and Dharmi A Parekh. Together, they own 93.04% of the company’s pre-IPO shares. Udaykumar Arunkumar Parekh is also the Chairman and Managing Director, and he’s been leading the business with around 19 years of experience.
Omnitech Engineering operates in a pretty crowded precision engineering space, where a lot of companies fight for the same kind of high-spec, export-driven orders. For listed peer comparison, the names usually put next to it are Azad Engineering Limited, Unimech Aerospace and Manufacturing Limited, PTC Industries Limited, MTAR Technologies Limited, and Dynamatic Technologies Limited. Broadly, it’s competing globally to supply precision-machined components for advanced industrial and tech-heavy sectors.
Omnitech Engineering earns mainly by making and exporting high-precision components and assemblies (assembled sets of parts made to tight specs). In FY25, it reported revenue of ₹342.91 crore, and a large 74.95% of that came from international markets, so exports are a big driver. Most of the income comes from selling finished products, with some additional revenue coming from job work (manufacturing work done for others) and tooling services (making or using specialised tools and fixtures needed in production).