Kotak Kaynes Saga Explained: Why Kaynes Tech Stock Fell 12% Today

Kaynes Technology’s stock has come under renewed pressure, falling nearly 12 percent today after fresh concerns resurfaced around its financial disclosures and accounting practices. The sharp reaction follows Kotak Institutional Equities’ report questioning the company’s transparency, which triggered a series of clarifications from Kaynes. Despite the company’s attempts to address these points, investor sentiment remains fragile, and the issues highlighted continue to weigh on the stock.

At the heart of this entire episode is one simple idea. Kaynes Technology, its manufacturing subsidiary Kaynes Electronics Manufacturing and its acquired entity Iskraemeco are deeply connected through internal transactions, guarantees and shared financial responsibilities. When such linkages are large and complex, even small gaps or inconsistencies in reporting can create doubts about transparency. 

Kotak believes these gaps may hide risks. Kaynes maintains that the numbers are correct at the consolidated level and that the issues came only from missing notes in standalone statements. To understand what has really caused the market to panic, here are the major issues Kotak highlighted and how Kaynes responded to each.

Missing or inconsistent related-party disclosures

Kotak’s most serious concern was the lack of clear disclosure about large transactions between Kaynes Technology, Kaynes EM and Iskraemeco. Iskraemeco reported purchases of ₹180 crore from Kaynes EM, year-end payables of ₹320 crore to Kaynes Technology, and another ₹180 crore payable to Kaynes EM, along with receivables of ₹190 crore from Kaynes Technology. None of this appeared in the related-party disclosures of Kaynes Technology or Kaynes EM.

Related-party reporting is one of the most important aspects of corporate governance. When these details are missing, it raises immediate questions about transparency and the true financial health of the group.

Kaynes admitted the omission but said it occurred only in the standalone financials. According to the company, all these transactions were eliminated in the consolidated statements as required by accounting standards. They described the lapse as inadvertent and said they have already corrected the disclosures.

Sharp rise in contingent liabilities

Kotak also flagged the sharp jump in contingent liabilities, which touched around ₹520 crore or nearly 18 percent of the company’s net worth. A large part of this came from performance guarantees for Iskraemeco projects and corporate guarantees issued to Kaynes EM and Iskraemeco. Such guarantees expose the parent company to significant financial risk if subsidiaries face cash flow issues.

Kaynes explained that the guarantees were necessary to support Iskraemeco after its acquisition. They clarified the numbers further, noting that ₹96.8 crore was toward performance guarantees and ₹132.5 crore represented corporate guarantees. The company said these guarantees were normal in the industry and tied to business requirements.

Goodwill recognition and acquisition accounting

Kotak also raised questions about how Kaynes valued goodwill and recognised intangible assets after acquiring Iskraemeco. The concern was that these assets may have been overstated, making the financials harder to assess accurately.

Kaynes responded by pointing to Ind AS 103, the accounting standard governing acquisitions. The company said it is required to identify intangible assets such as customer contracts and amortise them over time. Kaynes clarified that the recognised intangible assets were netted off with goodwill and that these valuations are reviewed annually.

Capitalisation of intangible assets and capex reporting

Another concern was the capitalisation of ₹180 crore under technical know-how, designs and prototypes. Kotak viewed the size of this capitalisation as a potential sign of aggressive accounting, especially when measured against the company’s revenue.

Kaynes broke down the ₹180 crore to explain the components. This included ₹115 crore worth of customer contract assets, ₹26 crore of development cost from the Iskraemeco acquisition and ₹39 crore from in-house research and development. The company said these were legitimate assets created through business activity and followed all applicable accounting rules.

Very high borrowing cost

Kotak calculated Kaynes’ borrowing cost to be about 17.7 percent in FY25, which appeared unusually high and raised doubts about debt management and financial efficiency.

Kaynes countered this by pointing out that Kotak’s calculation did not include bill discounting. Once bill discounting is added, the effective borrowing cost comes down to around 10 percent. The company also noted that using Kotak’s approach would make FY24 borrowing costs look even higher, which they argued shows the limitation of the calculation.

Where this leaves investors

The issues Kotak raised are not about profits or revenue but about trust, clarity and governance. When a fast-growing company expands aggressively through acquisitions and internal group structures, investors expect disclosures to be sharp, complete and consistent. Kotak’s concerns show that even if the financial numbers are correct at a consolidated level, missing disclosures in standalone statements can trigger anxiety in the market.

Kaynes has responded to each point and insists the business remains fundamentally strong. But the broader question investors are asking is whether internal controls and disclosure practices need to improve. Until the market regains confidence that the group’s reporting is fully transparent, the stock may continue to reflect caution.

Conclusion

• The sharp fall in Kaynes’ share price was driven less by business performance and more by concerns around transparency, especially missing related-party disclosures that matter deeply for governance.
• The Kotak report exposed how complex financial linkages between Kaynes, Kaynes EM and Iskraemeco can create risk if not disclosed clearly, even when consolidated numbers remain correct.
• Kaynes’ responses show the business may not be fundamentally weak, but internal controls and disclosure accuracy need strengthening to restore investor confidence.
• Large contingent liabilities and high capitalised intangible assets are not necessarily signs of distress, but they demand close monitoring because they influence long-term financial resilience.
• The saga highlights a broader lesson for investors. In high-growth, acquisition-heavy companies, trust in financial reporting is as important as revenue and profits. Governance gaps can move the stock more than operational performance.

Disclaimer:

Investments in the securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. The securities are quoted as an example and not as a recommendation. This is nowhere to be considered as advice, recommendation, or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell or subscribe for securities. INDStocks SIP / Mini Save is a SIP feature that enables Customer(s) to save a fixed amount on a daily basis to invest in Indian stocks. INDstocks Private Limited (formerly known as INDmoney Private Limited) 616, Level 6, Suncity Success Tower, Sector 65, Gurugram, 122005, SEBI Stock Broking Registration No: INZ000305337, Trading and Clearing Member of NSE (90267, M70042) and BSE, BSE StarMF (6779), SEBI Depository Participant Reg. No. IN-DP-690-2022, Depository Participant ID: CDSL 12095500, Research Analyst Registration No. INH000018948 BSE RA Enlistment No. 6428. Refer to https://indstocks.com/pricing?type=indian-stocks; https://www.indstocks.com/page/indian-stocks-sip-terms-and-condition for further details.